Managed penetration testing service datasheet
Large testing programs fail on logistics, not tradecraft. Maverc absorbs the scoping, scheduling, operator coordination, budget tracking, and reporting so your team spends its hours fixing findings instead of managing a vendor bench.
What's inside
- How a managed testing program removes scheduling and onboarding overhead
- The Center of Excellence model: who sits on your dedicated team
- Coverage across network, application, cloud, mobile, OT, and AI systems
- Retest and validation workflow that proves findings are actually closed
- Reporting formats built for engineers, executives, and auditors
- How testing evidence maps to CMMC, NIST 800-171, HIPAA, and FedRAMP
Who it's for
- Security leaders running multiple tests across business units each year
- Defense contractors and agencies with recurring assessment obligations
- Healthcare, financial, and critical-infrastructure operators under audit
- Teams whose pen test findings pile up faster than they get remediated
We manage the complexity so your team can manage risk
Once an organization runs more than a handful of assessments a year, the work shifts from testing to administration. Scopes get rewritten, procurement stalls, testers rotate off, report formats diverge, and nobody can answer the only question leadership asks: are we measurably harder to breach than last year?
Maverc's managed penetration testing program replaces that scramble with a single operating rhythm. One intake process. One reporting standard. A dedicated team that keeps context between engagements so the second test is sharper than the first.
The result is a testing program that survives turnover, satisfies auditors, and produces a defensible record of improvement.
A Center of Excellence model for offensive testing
Consistency, communication, and coverage across every engagement your organization runs with Maverc.
Program management, not one-off tests
A dedicated program manager owns your calendar, scope intake, statements of work, and budget tracking. You stop chasing coordination threads and start reviewing results.
A named team, not a ticket queue
Every engagement is staffed by the same core group: program manager, technical lead, engagement manager, and a consistent operator pod that learns your environment.
Testing on a mission cadence
Annual, quarterly, or release-driven testing sequenced around your change windows, contract deadlines, and audit dates instead of vendor availability.
Continuous improvement loop
Findings are trended across engagements so you can see whether the same root causes keep resurfacing — and prove measurable reduction to your board.
Three phases, zero guesswork
Every engagement follows the same disciplined sequence, whether we're testing a single application or an enterprise portfolio.
- Phase 01
Scope and prioritize
We inventory the assets, applications, and mission systems in play, agree on rules of engagement, and rank targets by exposure and business impact — not by whatever was tested last year.
- Phase 02
Test like an adversary
Operators combine manual tradecraft with tooling to chain findings the way real intrusion sets do: initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and impact on the data that matters.
- Phase 03
Report, retest, and prove closure
You get reproducible evidence, prioritized remediation guidance, an executive summary, and a retest that confirms the fix held. Findings close out with documentation your assessors accept.
Available across every testing discipline we field
One program covers the full estate — so you are not negotiating a new vendor relationship every time your attack surface changes.
External & internal network
Perimeter, segmentation, Active Directory, and lateral movement paths.
Web & API applications
Authenticated business-logic abuse, access control, and API authorization flaws.
Cloud environments
Azure, AWS, and M365/GCC High identity, configuration, and privilege escalation review.
Mobile applications
iOS and Android client, storage, and backend service assessment.
OT & ICS systems
Safety-first assessment of industrial networks, protocols, and control boundaries.
AI & LLM systems
Prompt injection, data exfiltration, and agent permission-scope abuse testing.
What a managed program changes
- One vendor, one contract vehicle, one reporting standard across every test
- Fewer internal hours lost to scoping, procurement, and tester onboarding
- Evidence packages that satisfy assessors, regulators, and cyber insurers
- Year-over-year risk trending your leadership can actually read
Want to talk through scope, cadence, and cost before you download anything? Our operators will walk your environment with you and tell you plainly what needs testing first.